|
 |

The Ideal of Oneness
What God Intended Marriage to Be
Genesis is the book of beginnings. While telling
the story of creation, it also describes the first marriage—between
the first man and woman. To better understand our
Creator’s original design for this relationship,
it is crucial to take a thoughtful look at what God had in mind
“in the beginning.”
God created man in His own image,
in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them
(Gen. 1:27).
This text shows that God had something uniquely
different in mind for humans than for the rest of creation. While
all of creation reflects the awesome power and creative genius of
the mind of God, men and women were uniquely designed to reflect the
heart of their Creator. Husbands and wives are to reflect the goodness
and wonder of their Maker. Even the process God used to bring our
first parents to life hints at their significant place in His plan.
Instead of speaking man into existence as He had done with everything
else (Gen. 1:3,6,9,14, 20,24), God showed additional care by the way
He used His own “hands” to mold and shape Adam. According to the book
of Genesis, God formed man from “the dust of the ground” and then
breathed into His creation His own living breath (2:7).
The image behind the word formed is that of a sculptor who moistens
dry clay and squeezes and molds it into the exact shape he wants.
No doubt the intensity of God’s concern in this special act of creation
is related to the fact that He was making a creature in His own likeness.
Adam was equipped with the capacities of personhood like God. Bible
scholars affirm that such capacities as thinking, feeling, choosing,
relating, and communicating with words are all manifestations of God’s
image in man.
So God placed this perfect man in the perfect environment of the Garden
of Eden and put him in charge of ruling over it (Gen. 1:26). All was
right with the world—or at least that’s what we would expect in a
perfect world. But God’s own commentary on the situation revealed
that something was “not good” (2:18). Man was alone. That was a problem.
Had God forgotten to make a companion? Hardly. But why didn’t He just
scrape together two piles of soil, breathe into them His divine breath,
and initiate the first marriage right from the start? That would have
been obvious. But God is not a God of the obvious and expected.
God reveals Himself to us not only by what He does but also by how
He chooses to do it. God doesn’t confine Himself just to the facts
of the narrative but also reveals glimpses of His heart in how He
tells the story. We must read the Bible with both mind and heart to
understand the implications for us as modern readers. God did have
a solution for Adam’s loneliness. But first He gave him a job—naming
the animals.
The Necessity For Companionship. Giving Adam the task of naming
all the animals God had created (2:19-20) seems out of place in the
natural flow of the story. One would expect that once God identified
Adam’s need for a helper (2:18) that He would have gotten right to
it (2:21-22). The statements immediately preceding and following the
account of Adam’s job, however, imply that God was using Adam’s work
to teach him something. God wanted Adam to learn the necessity for
companionship by discovering for himself three timeless truths.
It is not good for man to be alone. God knew that because
Adam was alone, he needed a companion to help him (2:18). Adam seemed
unaware of his aloneness. But in the process of naming the animals
he became aware of something. He noticed that each of the animals
God brought to him had mates “according to their kinds” (7 times in
Gen. 1). God made companions for the animals. What God knew from the
beginning of man’s creation, Adam discovered in the process of naming
the animals—that there was no one of his own kind for him to relate
to. He experienced human loneliness. He longed for companionship with
another like himself. He learned that doing good work was not intended
to be a replacement for a meaningful relationship.

Purposeful work is not fulfilling enough. Put yourself in
Adam’s place. Imagine the joy he must have felt as an active participant
with God. No longer was he just one of the creatures. Instead, he
was making a difference in his world. What a privilege to be asked
and entrusted with the creative process of naming the animals. Adam
got his first taste of being made in the image of the Creator God
by experiencing the joy of creative work. His God-likeness must have
amazed and humbled him at the same time. While he must have been energized
by the monumental task of naming what God had made, Adam soon realized
that creative work would never fulfill his longing for relationship.
Creative management of the garden was an expression of God-likeness,
but man was made to reflect God’s image most fully in the context
of relationships. Amazingly, Adam discovered that his longing for
relationship was not fulfilled by his relationship with God.
Relationship with God alone is not enough. For those familiar
with the Bible, that might sound like heresy. Asaph’s words ring in
our ears: “Whom have I in heaven but You? And earth has nothing I
desire besides You” (Ps. 73:25). But it is God Himself who designed
Adam for more than a relationship with Himself. He made man to deeply
connect with others as well. Jesus reaffirmed God’s design in Matthew
22:37-40 when He declared that the summary of all the Law and Prophets
hangs on the two commands to love God and to love others. God has
always intended for us to have a passionately heartfelt relationship
with Him that overflows into loving relationships with others.
So God planned for Adam to discover through his own work that he had
been designed and equipped for companionship. God’s solution for man’s
aloneness was a woman.
The Provision Of A Partner. God put Adam to sleep and then
proceeded to form a woman from the material He took from Adam’s side
(Gen. 2:21-22). To simply say that “God made a woman” is too bland
a translation of the Hebrew (v.22). It is more descriptive to say
that God “built” the woman with His own hands—just as He sculpted
the man from dust. Again, as in the creation of Adam, God was intimately
involved in handcrafting a woman who was tailor-made for the man.
The perfect match for man. It is difficult for us to comprehend
what Adam experienced when he awoke from his divinely induced sleep
and was introduced to the first woman. The biblical author records
his words at seeing this vision of feminine beauty:
This is now bone of my bones and flesh
of my flesh; she shall be called “woman,” for she was taken out
of man (Gen. 2:23).
A joyful exuberance must have swept over Adam,
because he burst forth in poetic verse—not a common response for most
men! Adam knew prior to his “operation” that he was the only one of
his kind, yet now God had made two from one. He recognized at once
that the woman was more like him than any other creature and yet uniquely
and wonderfully distinct. He must have been attracted to her in every
way possible, because God knew exactly what man needed and desired
the most.
I think we can safely assume that something deep within Adam’s masculine
heart was moved toward the woman who so perfectly completed and complemented
him. Clearly it wasn’t just her body that pleased Adam; it was the
potential for a relationship with one who was so obviously his counterpart.
The perfect complement. In time it would become apparent that
God’s plan was for man to love and protect the woman as God Himself
cared for both of them (Eph. 5:25). From the first pages of Genesis,
though, we learn that woman was built from man and for man (see also
1 Cor. 11:8-12). She was the helper specially designed by God and
in His image to complete what was lacking in Adam (Gen. 2:18). Therefore,
a relationship with a woman provides a man with the opportunity to
experience his maleness most fully. Conversely, it is in a relationship
with a man that a woman discovers a special union that draws out her
femaleness most fully. Prior to the creation of woman, man’s maleness
was undefined. But in a relationship with a woman, a man is drawn
to respond in ways that define his masculinity.
Much can be learned from observing this first relationship. God began
with one, made two from the one, and then made one from the two. God’s
plan for marriage is reunification—connecting a man and a woman in
the holy bonds of matrimony to celebrate their oneness in likeness
to their Creator.
The Process Of Making Two Into One. In Genesis 2:24, God uses
the occasion of the first marriage to outline a threefold process
for building oneness that remains as the ideal model for all marriages:
For this reason a man will leave his
father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become
one flesh.
For a man and a woman to build an intimate union
that has no rivals requires separation, bonding, and celebration.
Separation describes a process of exchanging the natural loyalties
one has to parents for a new loyalty with one’s spouse. The Hebrew
term translated “leave” is a strong one that is often translated “forsake”
elsewhere. While the rest of Scripture makes it clear that this doesn’t
mean that a couple is to cut off all contact and communication with
one’s family. It does indicate, however, that a clear separation from
parental priorities, traditions, and influence is necessary if a couple
is to bond together in their own home.
The man is directed to initiate the separation. He must abandon the
nurturing parent-child relationship to prepare for the nurturing husband-wife
relationship. By detaching from his parents, he frees himself to form
a new alliance with his bride. This willful shift in core loyalties
is necessary for the bride as well. There must never be a loyalty
to anyone else, whether parent or child, friend or family, that is
greater than the loyalty to one’s spouse. “The failure to shift loyalty
from parents to spouse is a central issue in almost all marital conflict.”1
Every couple must hammer out their own values, traditions, and priorities
that will define their home without allowing parental intrusion or
interference. Once separation from parents is initiated, a couple
can begin building a new bond together.
Bonding is the relational heart of a marriage. The term translated
“be united to” literally conveys the idea of being attached or glued
together. This emotional, relational, and spiritual bonding makes
a couple inseparable. Jesus described the divine power of this adhesive
by declaring that no man should try to separate what God has joined
together in marriage (Mt. 19:4-6).
An analogy from the carpenter’s shop may help our understanding. All
cabinetmakers agree that the strongest and most beautiful joint for
building drawers is a dovetail joint. It is also the most expensive
and time-consuming to produce. It requires a craftsman to cut opposing
sets of pins and tails so that they interlock with each other. Once
the joint is glued and set, the wood on either side of the joint can
splinter under pressure but the joint will hold strong. Because of
the cross-grain design of the joint and the resin used to connect
them, beauty and strength are both enhanced. So it is in marriage.
When the bold strength of a man’s heart is joined with the tender
beauty of a woman’s, their ability to mirror the strength and beauty
of the God they are designed to reflect is enhanced. The relationship
of two hearts that are bound together by commitment, communication,
and conjoined life stories must always precede the celebration of
oneness through the intercourse of their bodies.
Celebration of marital oneness is what emotional and sexual
intimacy is about. It follows separating and bonding. A sexual relationship
apart from bonding is an immature groping for physical pleasure that
pales in comparison to what God intended. When a couple is bonding
spiritually, the most natural desire is to merge physically. “Becoming
one flesh” is the biblical terminology for sexual intercourse. God
indicated that the pleasures of sexual intimacy are exclusively intended
for those who have first committed to do the hard work of building
emotional, relational, and spiritual intimacy. The divine intention
for husband and wife from the very beginning was monogamy.
God’s observation that “the man and his wife were both naked, and
they felt no shame” (Gen. 2:25) affirms the purity of sexual intimacy
in marriage. Nakedness without shame is symbolic of the fact that
openness was normal. Self-centered acts against God and against each
other had not yet corrupted the hearts of Adam and Eve. Nothing was
wrong with anything. Everything was “very good” (1:31). Neither person
was self-conscious.
Uninhibited enjoyment was marked by each giving unashamedly to the
other without a hint of exploitation. The celebration of their love
was complete.
There is an awe that can be experienced in the act of sexual intimacy
between a husband and wife that parallels the experience of worship.
Such an intimate and vulnerable union with another who equally bears
the image of God can compel the hearts of lovers to celebrate in awe
and wonder the immensity of God’s goodness and His willingness to
share His glory with men and women.
The Purpose Of Oneness In Marriage. Oneness is the joyful
sense of connection that a husband and wife experience as a result
of their exclusive and unparalleled devotion to each other. Such oneness
reflects the union enjoyed in the triunity of God (Jn. 17:20-24) and
fleshes out an example of Christ’s sacrificial and enduring love for
His church (Rom. 8:35-39; Eph. 5:25-32). Unity enhances the couple’s
ability to reflect the goodness of God as they live out their calling
to fill, subdue, rule over, and care for the earth (Gen. 1:28; 2:15).
Oneness is the sense of completion and complement that a husband and
wife experience with each other that is often indescribable. It is
much more than familiarity or predictability. There is a union of
heart, soul, mind, body, will, direction, passion, and purpose. They
long to share life’s experiences together. They know each other deeply
and still delight in each other’s presence, not just in their performance.
Marriage partners who are “soul mates” have a joyful sense of interdependence
that deepens as a result of the lifetime connection with a devoted
companion.
But for many couples, oneness has not been their experience. Conflict
and chaos have replaced connection and celebration. Instead of being
allies, they act more like enemies.
What has so deeply marred the beauty of God’s original design for
marriage that, like the oak table mentioned earlier, it is being discarded
as undesirable?
[Discovery
Series Home]
[Order
Here]
©
2001 RBC Ministries Grand Rapids, MI 49555 Printed in USA
Used with permission.
|
 |
|
 |